Thursday
11Mar2010

A face for radio?

Help!

We are four episodes into our podcast and while we feel really good about it, there's also this feeling-something like a little like a kid just getting on a two wheeler, lots of potential, could be awesome...but wobbly at the moment. So we're turning to you all out there for feedback...what do you think of the podcast?

The style of the hosting (I write these posts in the "we" tense, because we're a team, but you can criticize me, I can take it), the content, the length, frequency of the content. Nothing is off limits...we want the podcast to be a valuable place for information and discussion of green building. So you can do us HUGE favor and tell us what YOU want more of...

The comment section is always open, but if you'd like to write us a private note, you can email us at podcast@build2sustain.com

 

 

Wednesday
10Mar2010

Making Green Make Cents

For our next series of Advisory Board member guest posts, we are asking "What are you working on?"  Advisory Board member Sara Sweeney starts off this week with all of the projects that have been keeping her busy lately.  You can find out more about Sara on the B2S team page.

I feel a little bit like this post is a What I Did on my Summer Vacation post, and that’s kind of fun. 

2009 was by no means a stellar year for most of us. And if Raquel and James had asked me to write this post a year ago, it would have been a pretty short post, stating “trying to get work.” Last year at this time, I was teaching and that was it. However, because of that, because of having no work, it forced me to innovate both myself and my business in ways I did not expect I would need to do. It also opened doors to opportunities I never expected –even if the opportunities took months to come to fruition. Today, I can write that I am quite busy on several different fronts. 

I continue to teach part time at Philadelphia University, which I love. I teach a class on building systems and materials to the sophomores in the Department of Architecture. It’s their first introduction to how buildings go together, how they really work. Not only do I love the class and teaching, I also love the energy of the students and learning from them. It is indeed a win-win scenario. 

On the business front, I have a few LEED consulting projects in the works now. One project is with my former firm, Blackney Hayes Architects and is a new 72,000 sf academic building for Ocean County College. It is my first LEED v3 project and I am very excited to be really getting my head into the new rating system. I have also just started two smaller projects, also LEED v3 projects. One is a small Black Box theater for a CDC in the Kensington Section of Philadelphia, with a very talented young and local firm, ISA, Brian Phillips and Daryn Edwards at the healm. The other project is a new mixed use building for PBCIP, a non-profit neighborhood organization in Camden, NJ. PBCIP wants to build a landmark new sustainable office, retail and training facility at a prominent intersection in the Parkside section of Camden. Once a vibrant industrial city, Camden now has the reputation of being one of the worst cities in the United States. To be part of this project is very exciting. Also exciting is the architecture and engineering firm I am working with, DCM Architect + Engineering, a Camden-based firm headed by Eduardo Guzman and Robert Bensen. Eduardo is one of the most talented and forward-thinking architects I have met, and I can only say the same about Robert, who is a P.E.  

I am also working with strategic partner, Scott Chrisner, of Chrisner Group, on the Home Performance with Energy Star residential energy audit program, as well as offering full service green project management. It is part of the New Jersey Clean Energy program, and being a part of this new program here in New Jersey is very exciting.  

Finally, I am being trained by Bedford Cost Segregation, a company dedicated to providing cost segregation services, to help them out with projects. It is essentially a tax planning strategy to accelerate depreciation deductions and improve cash flow. It is a completely different way to look at a building, since its focus is breaking down the building specific to components which depreciate in 39, 15, and 7 years. The faster a component depreciates, the more money is available in deductions up front. I really wasn’t sure if I’d like the work –I was able to test the waters a few weeks ago on one project. I was surprised at how interesting I find it, and now I am taking the next steps to learn more so I can continue consulting with them. 

Looking at this list, I never would have expected a year ago that this is what I would be working on, nor would I have expected I would be this busy. But I knew I needed to keep at it last year, and it has paid off in the end. Now, I need to get back to work!

Wednesday
03Mar2010

LEED, Living Building Challenge, and the Future of Green Building

Well you can't call us shy with a post title like that. However, we've got the content to back it up this week we've got the first of our two-part interview with Scot Horst and Jason Mclennan. Scot is the Senior VP of LEED at the USGBC and Jason is the CEO of Cascadia and leader of the Living Building Challenge. We were proud to have them join us for a conversation centered on the future green building here in the US and around the world. We're live with part one of our discussion today, look for part two next week.

We'd like to thank Scot and Jason for joining us, and a special shout out to Advisory Board member Elaine Hsieh for pulling this discussion together.

As always the podcast is available right here on the website or subscribe via iTunes.

 

Wednesday
03Mar2010

Technology and Build2Sustain

We are pleased to have Advisory Board member, Gregory Arkin, share his thoughts today in his first guest post for Build2Sustain.  You can find out more about Greg on the B2S Team page.

"A chance to define our process when it comes to assessing and designing sustainable building solutions keeping ROI and payback in the foreground. We also get to test the idea of open sourcing and crowd sourcing solutions when it comes to green retrofit and design. In essence we are developing how we will retrofit buildings across the country in an open way. We want the entire community to be part of fixing our existing commercial real estate. We feel the problem is just that large."
 
"Build2Sustain operates as a construction consultant. That is to say our role is to coordinate the project, manage the timeline and deliverables, facilitate communication between stakeholders, maintain transparency of process, develop sustainability strategy, and of course recruit team members."
 
"An estimated 10%-15% of Construction Cost is attributed to rework. That is work that has to be redone because of miscommunication from the client or the design team or because of an error by a contractor. That cost is baked into to all well written construction contracts, it's an unexplained tax on building something. It's not malicious or deceitful, simply put people make mistakes, and those (usually) minor mistakes can add up to serious cost."
 
I wanted to start my first Build2Sustain guest post with a couple of snippets from previous posts from James Bedell.  I've had my own blog for 3 years now and almost hit 1,000 posts last year.  Yet, when I asked to write my first guest post, I was stumped as to what to write about.  When I asked Raquel for a topic, she said just to write something about green renovation and retrofit.  Well, that's an easy topic for me, but how do I put my spin on it and top any of the posts that James has written.  Not an easy task.
 
I'm in Las Vegas at the moment attending an annual software conference for Autodesk.  Much of what I'm learning about in the sessions can't be disclosed just yet, but some of the hot topics are BIM for Construction, Sustainability and Rapid Energy Modeling.  Looking at the snippets above, I see the words ROI, designing sustainable building solutions, coordinate the project, transparency, rework, miscommunication, error, mistakes and costs.  Wow, that's a lot.  Meanwhile, it's 6:30am, the house I'm staying in has the worst insulation because I'm freezing inside while it's 46 degrees out and they won't turn on the heat.  I could swear Vegas was built in the desert.  Did I mention the 40 million light bulbs flashing 24 hours a day outside each hotel and restaurant.  I've never seen such an energy consuming town in my life.  Ironic that our conference is here and discussing many of the topics that Build2Sustain is focusing on.
 
I'm going to make it my goal to do everything I can from the software and technology side to help James and the team find the most efficient and economical ways retrofit existing buildings and create new sustainable designs.  I've been working with some newer design technologies that were amazing, and with what I saw yesterday, will make all of our work even easier in the near future.  Between the new requirements of LEED 3.0, energy audit requirements, green washing, documentation, coordination, and "there's no way I'm going to share my drawings with the contractor", the world has rapidly changed in the design, engineering and construction process.  I'm a technology, efficiency and automation evangelist.  Resistance is futile to the new technologies that are available to all of us to make the world more sustainable. 
 
It won't be easy.  There are a lot of new things to learn.  Status quo just won't cut it with the goals of Build2Sustain and many others.  There's a learning curve.  It's a different approach.  It requires math, sharing of ideas, designs, data and you have to leave your ego at the door.  If you read this blog regularly, then you're already on board.  Someone yesterday was talking about the recent earthquakes around the world.  I said, it's because of the ice melting on the polar caps, that reducing the weight on the tectonic plates, that's causing them to shift, thus creating the earthquakes.  I just made that up and I really hope that I'm wrong about that theory.  If by some chance I'm right, we really need to speed up our plans for sustainability and retrofits.
 
I look forward to posting again soon with a lot more specifics.  Again, rereading the top three paragraphs, I hope to do my part to share my experiences and the workflow and processes to make us all a lot more consultative and have a lot less paperwork to deal with.  Thank you.
Wednesday
03Mar2010

Commercial Real Estate Investment Company to "Green" its Entire Portfolio

The NY Times yesterday highlighted Jamestown Properties, a German commercial real estate company that is planning on undertaking sustainable renovations for all of its US properties.  You can read the full article here.  In the article, Matt Bronfman, the managing director and COO, mentions a "European perspective" as a reason why.  I am fairly certain that this perspective is just as conscious of company profits.  Here at Build2Sustain, we dedicated an entire white paper to the business benefits of sustainable renovation.  How long will it take for American companies to see the advantages in making similar investments in their holdings a high priority?

Monday
01Mar2010

From Green Building Law Blog: TD Bank Goes Carbon Neutral 

The estimable Shari Shapiro talked with Frank Sherman of TD Bank about their decision to become carbon neutral. 

A brief excerpt:

GBLB:  What is the motivation behind TD Bank's green initiative? 

Frank Sherman: Lack of Federal leadership leaves it up to private enterprise. Right now, the private sector is going to have to pull us through in the short term.  Our green initiative is work we have been focusing on for a year and a half internally. The driver stems from TD Bank Financial Group in Toronto. Their senior leadership made the decision to become carbon neutral as a company. Their initial commitment early last year or late 2008 was to become carbon neutral by end of October of 2010.

There's much more in the interview about primary strategy and implemenation. Mr. Sherman even touches on green building. Great piece, Shari!

 

 

 

Sunday
28Feb2010

Paralysis By Analysis

Heifer.org is dedicated to solving world hunger. Their organization is not only effective, but they’ve developed a body of intellectual work around philanthropy that’s worth a read, if you’ve never checked them out you should. The organization posts thought pieces under their learning section and one passage really struck me.  I often wonder if the green building sector and more importantly the green building market is stuck in a mode of Paralysis By Analysis (I borrowed the graphic from Heifer.org, thanks). The writers desribe a condition we all know well. We know we should take action...we know how to make things better, but we’re also aware of the risks involved. We calculate the risks at the same time we calculate the benefits.

What if I promise we’ll be LEED Gold certified and we don’t make it?
What if I promise a 40% reduction in energy and we don’t deliver?


Even over at our podcast the very first episode was dedicated to managing client expectations and protecting building pros through professional liability. Our caution can lead to inaction, no one wants to over promise on green results. Cautious soft language dominates our websites and our literature. Statements like...(and I’m not quoting from anyone in particular here)

Gains in efficiency will significantly reduce energy consumption and therefore carbon footprint. 

Tepid. Uninspiring. Why Bother? This language makes our potential clients less enthusiastic about jumping into sustainability.


Couple that kind of language with conflicting reports in the media about the best initiatives in the industry, like LEED and Energy Star. Stories like these only foment cycles of misinformation and lead to further paralysis. Am I saying LEED or Energy Star or any competing standard is perfect? Couse not. What I'm saying is they're making progress. Progress should be something we're all after.

Imagine if we’d had the same kind of caution when it came to proliferating say, the automobile or the PC. What if Henry Ford had promised marginal improvement to our daily lives with the automobile? What if Microsoft’s goal had been to put a computer on 20-30% of the desktops in the world? These companies set bold goals. They had big ambitions larger than profit alone. They wanted to fundamentally change the world, change markets and improve people’s lives. Yes, they also stumble, remember the Ford Pinto? Remember Windows Vista?  Big companies with bold goals sometimes fail, but we must fail forward. Has the building industry created so many barriers to success that we are afraid to set bold goals? Are we afraid to change the world? Are we too afraid too fail forward?

There are some that will say the industry doesn't lack big vision. It lacks a big market. The argument goes something like:

There is no incentive (particularly in this economy) for building owners in the commercial world to take up the cause. They will lease their buildings to businesses and continue to make a profit on their building stock whether or not they improve it for the betterment of their clients, the nation, the globe or whoever.

To those people I would remind them of two things...

First, the buildings that are the most efficient, productive, healthy and well designed i.e. the best buildings will be leased first and at higher rates. Period.

Second, I would also quote the great Henry Ford...

The highest use of capital isn't to make more money, but to make money do more for the betterment of life. 

So how bold should we be...

I can’t speak for the industry, but I can tell you Build2Sustain’s North Star Goal:

To make every commercial space in the United States sustainable.


Northstar goals are big and open ended by nature, but if we don’t start pursuing them...
 
Who will?

Wednesday
24Feb2010

The P.A.C.E Needs to Quicken

We are happy to have to have Advisory Board member, Ted Kohnen, share his thoughts about a new energy efficiency initiative for homeowners.  You can find out more about Ted on the B2S team page.  Add your thoughts to the comment section below!

How many programs do you know of that make banks happy, homeowners happy and the city they live in happy? Oh, and let’s not forget the environment. Not many, right? The PACE (Property-Assessed Clean Energy) initiative is doing just that. PACE is a way to finance energy efficiency retrofits, whereby the city provides the homeowner a loan to install solar panels, new windows, etc. and the homeowner repays through property tax bills over a set period of time. Here’s the beauty of it; because the energy savings will outweigh the property tax, there’s a low risk of loan default.

So far, PACE programs, or variations of it, have made it to 19 states – from California to New York. But, there’s always a catch. Not a catch so much, as a hurdle. For PACE to be offered in a particular town or city, local law must be changed. For example, one town in NY state, Babylon, Long Island has passed PACE legislation (AB 40004A). It’s great that Babylon did this (and it should be noted that the town of Babylon jumped on this very quickly in 2008), but consider how many towns/cities NY state has (62 counties made up of 932 towns and 62 cities). At this rate, New York will have this available to all residents in 120 years. Too long.

I think PACE is the kind of program that state governments (not local) or even the federal government should endorse (via legislation) to speed up the rate of adoption.

The benefits to all parties? Pacenow.org sums them up nicely on their website:

"Our Nation:
    * Significant job creation
    * Accelerates movement toward energy independence & reduces GHG emissions
    * Very low fiscal cost & high probability of success

Property Owner:
    * Lower energy bills and substantially reduced upfront costs for energy retrofits
    * Improved return on investment/positive cash flow on retrofits (annual savings > cost)

States, Cities & Municipalities:
    * Immediate job creation
    * No credit or general obligation risk
    * Obligation is liability of real estate owner
    * Greenhouse gas reductions/energy independence
    * Opt in: Only those real estate owners who opt in pay for it

Existing Mortgage Lenders:
    * Borrowers cash flow/credit profile improves (energy savings > annual tax cost)
    * Property/collateral value increases

Lender:
    * Virtually no risk of loss as property tax liens are senior to mortgage debt
    * 97% of property taxes are current & losses are less than 1%"