Entries in Energy Star (2)

Friday
20Nov2009

Design/Build Professionals great challenge: Make Green Make Sense

I am a firm believer that "green" will not become the norm in this country until certain basic steps are taken from voluntary to mandatory. Simplicity is the mother of replication and right now there are simply too many standards that a given product or building manufacturer can envoke to call themselves "green." Competing programs, Energy Star versus LEED for example, end up hurting both standards as they create a competitive, rather than cooperative environment. Then of course there are the moving goal posts. From the ever-readable Chris Cheatham's blog:

 First, why is the DOE willing to give up Energy Star products to the EPA? Turns out, the DOE has focused on a new building labeling system:

"[Cathy] Zoi, [the DOE's new assistant secretary for energy efficiency] pointed out that while D.O.E. has lost some of its Energy Star territory in the deal, it gained ownership of a new program that will develop an efficiency rating tool and labeling scheme for assessing energy in buildings — a major source of infrastructural inefficiency."

Second, how many more green labels can be created before consumers can no longer discern between them? Among the many plans put forth by the EPA and DOE, the agencies have proposed a "'Super Star' label to identify products that perform in the top five percent of any given category."

We need to move away from these competing standards, and move toward a universal one. The best example I can think of is UL. Underwriter's Laboratory signs off on nearly every product that uses electricity or heat in the United States. They came about based on a market need. Insurance underwriters were tired of insuring homes and having faulty electrical devices burn them to the ground. A standard was created that gave independent labs the power to review products under given standards and approve them for sale in the US. We need a green standard as simple and a clear as that if the movement is going to go mainstream. I imagine a day when no appliance could be sold in the US without an Energy Star label. Consumers didn't think about it, and the standardization debate happened behind the scenes. By the time these appliances were in our buildings we would know they reached a baseline for effiecency.

In the interim, we have to simplify "green" for our clients...

As a design/build professional how do you simplify green for your clients?

Tuesday
18Aug2009

Getting a "C"

First of all, if you are a regular visitor to the Build2Sustain website, THANKS! We're sorry for some of the changes in design, we're working on a new layout and a stronger landing page, so things might be a little wonky for a bit. As always, we'd love your feedback.

Enough about us-let's talk about rating systems, or more specifically a new rating system from ASHRAE. I came across this article from DJC Oregon, its worth a read all on it's one. The article describes the current war of the rating systems between Energy Star and ASHRAE. Energy Star has a pass/fail system for being in the 75th percentile or above for energy effiency. Whereas the new ASHRAE system will grade with a letter system to exemplify the best performers with higher grades. As always we have no great devotion to any specific code but there were some specific quotes from the article that caught my eye.

Building EQ (the new ASHRAE system) focuses solely on energy, unlike Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, which considers other factors. As such, Building EQ will appeal to building owners who wouldn’t consider LEED, said Louis Starr, a commissioning agent for Heery.

“I’ve seen schools say, ‘We want to do something about energy efficiency, but we don’t want to go through the LEED process because it costs a lot and a lot of it doesn’t relate specifically to energy efficiency,’ ” Starr said.

This is the crux of what I was trying to say with yesterday's post. LEED is an excellent rating system and presents real thought leadership. But it's not always the right fit for a given client. As design/build professionals it's our responsibility to steer our clients toward the best long term solution for them and the environment. I'm happy to see national organizations working to create more intelligent and more stringent rating systems. This last quote codifies the spirit of competition more rigorous rating can engender.

...the competitive nature of the grading scale could easily leave Energy Star in the dust.

“We all know what it feels like to get a ‘C,’ ” Kane said. “And we all know we want to do better.”

What's your take? The comment section awaits.