Tweet2Sustain

Build2Sustain on Facebook


Entries in Open Innovation (3)

Tuesday
Mar302010

The George Lucas Effect

This post is a little off the green building path, but it gives you some insight into how I think about innovation. One of the phrases I find particularly self serving is “making the future” it’s a meaningless phrase. By waking up in the morning and doing practically anything we’re making the future. “Making the future” isn’t innovating, problem solving is. Later today, I’ll be speaking with Mike Hines of Homepath Products for our podcast. I’m talking with Mike, because I think his company is developing a truly innovative and valuable product. I’ll let Mike speak for his product later on tonight. Right now, here’s my little lesson about a man who actually made the future of film through innovation, but that’s not the whole story.  

In the late 1970’s there was a young film maker…he came out of film school having created startlingly different and interesting pieces that got producers and movie houses interested in backing his first big motion picture. He took an idea he had been kicking around for years prior about a family at the center of a galactic revolution, and decided this film would be the first of a three part story about the fall of an empire. Of course, that film maker was George Lucas and film was Star Wars.

I am an unabashed, unashamed Star Wars Fan. I can recite on command practically any (yes any) passage from the original trilogy. However, watching George Lucas’ creative arch we can learn something about innovation and working within limitations. I call it the George Lucas Effect. In the late 70’s and into the 80’s the technology simply didn’t exist for Lucas to create the world of Star Wars. It had to be invented so he and his team of young visual artists set about the task of inventing the methods and tools necessary to make the film happen. Every solution wasn’t perfect, every model’s flight wasn't seamless, every special effect wasn’t so special. But at it’s core the story was simple and profoundly well told. The special effects of the original films served one purpose…to tell the larger story. The result was classic cinema.

Fast forward 20 years or so and it’s time to make the next trilogy. At that point digital effects are the norm, having largely been invented by Mr. Lucas’ company. But for most observers the heart of the films wasn’t quite there. There were plenty of amazing things to look at, but they didn’t all serve the story, and the story itself wasn’t as simple…and couldn’t be told as easily and with as much heart.

The result was a trilogy that couldn’t hold a candle to the original series. This is the George Lucas Effect, once you have all the toys you stop doing all the thinking. You’re no longer inventing things to tell your amazing story. You’re inventing things to make your movie look cooler.

There’s a lesson to learn here for all of us when it comes to innovating solutions. Beware the George Lucas Effect. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should, embellishment doesn’t equal innovation.

Are you telling an exquisite story…or adding some visual candy?

Wednesday
Mar032010

Technology and Build2Sustain

We are pleased to have Advisory Board member, Gregory Arkin, share his thoughts today in his first guest post for Build2Sustain.  You can find out more about Greg on the B2S Team page.

"A chance to define our process when it comes to assessing and designing sustainable building solutions keeping ROI and payback in the foreground. We also get to test the idea of open sourcing and crowd sourcing solutions when it comes to green retrofit and design. In essence we are developing how we will retrofit buildings across the country in an open way. We want the entire community to be part of fixing our existing commercial real estate. We feel the problem is just that large."
 
"Build2Sustain operates as a construction consultant. That is to say our role is to coordinate the project, manage the timeline and deliverables, facilitate communication between stakeholders, maintain transparency of process, develop sustainability strategy, and of course recruit team members."
 
"An estimated 10%-15% of Construction Cost is attributed to rework. That is work that has to be redone because of miscommunication from the client or the design team or because of an error by a contractor. That cost is baked into to all well written construction contracts, it's an unexplained tax on building something. It's not malicious or deceitful, simply put people make mistakes, and those (usually) minor mistakes can add up to serious cost."
 
I wanted to start my first Build2Sustain guest post with a couple of snippets from previous posts from James Bedell.  I've had my own blog for 3 years now and almost hit 1,000 posts last year.  Yet, when I asked to write my first guest post, I was stumped as to what to write about.  When I asked Raquel for a topic, she said just to write something about green renovation and retrofit.  Well, that's an easy topic for me, but how do I put my spin on it and top any of the posts that James has written.  Not an easy task.
 
I'm in Las Vegas at the moment attending an annual software conference for Autodesk.  Much of what I'm learning about in the sessions can't be disclosed just yet, but some of the hot topics are BIM for Construction, Sustainability and Rapid Energy Modeling.  Looking at the snippets above, I see the words ROI, designing sustainable building solutions, coordinate the project, transparency, rework, miscommunication, error, mistakes and costs.  Wow, that's a lot.  Meanwhile, it's 6:30am, the house I'm staying in has the worst insulation because I'm freezing inside while it's 46 degrees out and they won't turn on the heat.  I could swear Vegas was built in the desert.  Did I mention the 40 million light bulbs flashing 24 hours a day outside each hotel and restaurant.  I've never seen such an energy consuming town in my life.  Ironic that our conference is here and discussing many of the topics that Build2Sustain is focusing on.
 
I'm going to make it my goal to do everything I can from the software and technology side to help James and the team find the most efficient and economical ways retrofit existing buildings and create new sustainable designs.  I've been working with some newer design technologies that were amazing, and with what I saw yesterday, will make all of our work even easier in the near future.  Between the new requirements of LEED 3.0, energy audit requirements, green washing, documentation, coordination, and "there's no way I'm going to share my drawings with the contractor", the world has rapidly changed in the design, engineering and construction process.  I'm a technology, efficiency and automation evangelist.  Resistance is futile to the new technologies that are available to all of us to make the world more sustainable. 
 
It won't be easy.  There are a lot of new things to learn.  Status quo just won't cut it with the goals of Build2Sustain and many others.  There's a learning curve.  It's a different approach.  It requires math, sharing of ideas, designs, data and you have to leave your ego at the door.  If you read this blog regularly, then you're already on board.  Someone yesterday was talking about the recent earthquakes around the world.  I said, it's because of the ice melting on the polar caps, that reducing the weight on the tectonic plates, that's causing them to shift, thus creating the earthquakes.  I just made that up and I really hope that I'm wrong about that theory.  If by some chance I'm right, we really need to speed up our plans for sustainability and retrofits.
 
I look forward to posting again soon with a lot more specifics.  Again, rereading the top three paragraphs, I hope to do my part to share my experiences and the workflow and processes to make us all a lot more consultative and have a lot less paperwork to deal with.  Thank you.
Wednesday
Feb032010

Is the Construction Industry Ready for "Open?"

One of the goals of Build2Sustain open up the design/build process so the public can see (to overuse the phrase) how the sausage gets made. We want to do this, not just to better explore sustainability and green design, though these concepts lack a concrete definition in the market, or even within the design community. But even more fundamentally, we need to become better designers and better builders of buildings. The question I ask myself..."Is the Construction Industry Ready for 'Open?'"

An estimated 10%-15% of Construction Cost is attributed to rework. That is work that has to be redone because of miscommunication from the client or the design team or because of an error by a contractor. That cost is baked into to all well written construction contracts, it's an unexplained tax on building something. It's not malicious or decietful, simply put people make mistakes, and those (usually) minor mistakes can add up to serious cost.

We believe well-curated crowd sourcing mixed and open sharing of results throughout the design/build process is essential to compiling a set of best practices that can be employed widely throughout the industry. But are design and build pros ready to open up the process frankly. One Lighting Designer I worked with told me once "why would I blog? I get paid for what I know, if I tell you what I know for free, why would you pay me any more?"

That kind of thinking is very closed, it's pre-web and it's not conducive to our experiment. It's also rampant in an industry dominated by boomers. I think there are enough professionals of a different age and ethos that we can make it work, and almost more importantly, I think clients are going to begin to demand it. In an age where every dollar is closely guarded, clients are going to work with teams who make their process open. Clients increasingly will want to know everything about their building. They either built it themselves or are taking it over and I believe we can engage the owners of commericial buildings to be just as learned about the space, what went into it and the design process behind as we can for a homeowner, obsessing over every finish and stud.